UK Police apologise for putting 200 CCTV cameras in Muslim area -- Signs of the Times News: http://www.sott.net/articles/show/215872-UK-Police-apologise-for-putting-200-CCTV-cameras-in-Muslim-area
I think the author of this article is a biased Muslim.
Why? Because the cameras were there for security. You think if it had been a Christian area the cameras would have been removed and an apology issued? NO.
Add to that the fact that there was violence from the Muslim community in response to the cameras (as mentioned in other newspapers) and the fact that this author has failed to mention that little piece of very relevant information, and I'm certain I'm right.
This is blatantly a case of Muslims getting special treatment - and this is coming from someone who would intervene if he witnessed a Muslim being attacked, so I'm not some Muslim-hater.
SUMMARY: Virtually every terrorist has claimed to be a Muslim. These cameras were therefore put up OUT OF NECESSITY for security. Muslims demonstrated how peaceful they are by responding violently to the cameras - such people surely can not possibly be terrorists eh? The cameras were removed and the police apologised - the Muslims got special treatment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)